Sunday, April 21, 2024

Elon Musk Asks Choose to Dismiss $258B Dogecoin Lawsuit — Insists Tweeting Help for DOGE Is not Illegal – Featured Bitcoin Information

Tesla and Twitter CEO Elon Musk has requested a U.S. choose to dismiss a $258 billion lawsuit filed towards him by dogecoin traders. They alleged that the billionaire operated a pyramid scheme to advertise the meme cryptocurrency dogecoin. “There may be nothing illegal about tweeting phrases of assist for, or humorous photos about, a professional cryptocurrency that continues to carry a market cap of practically $10 billion,” Musk’s lawyer argued.

Elon Musk Needs Court docket to Dismiss Lawsuit by Dogecoin Buyers

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and Twitter, requested a U.S. choose on Friday to dismiss a $258 billion lawsuit alleging that he operated a pyramid scheme to advertise the meme cryptocurrency dogecoin (DOGE). The lawsuit, Johnson et al v. Musk et al, filed within the U.S. District Court docket for the Southern District of New York, alleges that Musk and his firms, Tesla and Spacex, “falsely and deceptively declare that dogecoin is a professional funding when it has no worth in any respect.”

In a proper request filed Friday, Musk’s authorized workforce described the lawsuit introduced by dogecoin traders as a “fanciful work of fiction” regarding Musk’s “innocuous and sometimes foolish tweets” concerning the meme cryptocurrency. They argued that the traders did not make clear how Musk supposed to defraud anybody or what dangers he hid. In addition they argued that the Tesla CEO’s feedback — reminiscent of “Dogecoin Rulz” and “no highs, no lows, solely Doge” — had been too ambiguous to assist a fraud allegation.

Musk’s legal professionals detailed:

There may be nothing illegal about tweeting phrases of assist for, or humorous photos about, a professional cryptocurrency that continues to carry a market cap of practically $10 billion … This court docket ought to put a cease to plaintiffs’ fantasy and dismiss the criticism.

Musk’s authorized workforce additionally disputed the DOGE traders’ assertion that dogecoin met the standards to be labeled as a safety. Whereas the chairman of the U.S. Securities and Change Fee (SEC), Gary Gensler, has mentioned in just a few interviews that all crypto tokens, besides bitcoin, are securities, many individuals have argued that his opinion is just not the regulation.

Nonetheless, Evan Spencer, the lawyer representing the dogecoin traders, said in an electronic mail: “We’re extra assured than ever that our case shall be profitable.”

In response to the traders, Musk deliberately drove up the worth of dogecoin by over 36,000% over two years, solely to subsequently let it crash. They claimed that this resulted in billions of {dollars} in earnings for Musk whereas different dogecoin traders suffered, regardless of Musk being conscious that the meme cryptocurrency lacked any intrinsic worth. Moreover, the traders cited Musk’s look on Saturday Night time Reside, the place he portrayed a fictional monetary skilled and referred to dogecoin as “a hustle.”

Regardless of the lawsuit, the Tesla and Twitter boss confirmed that he’ll proceed to purchase and assist DOGE. Musk is thought within the dogecoin group because the Dogefather. His electrical automobile firm, Tesla, accepts the meme crypto for some merchandise, and earlier this yr, he reaffirmed that he’ll eat a McDonald’s Blissful Meal on TV if the quick meals chain accepts funds in dogecoin.

Do you assume the choose ought to dismiss the lawsuit towards Elon Musk by dogecoin traders? Tell us within the feedback part under.

Kevin Helms

A scholar of Austrian Economics, Kevin discovered Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His pursuits lie in Bitcoin safety, open-source programs, community results and the intersection between economics and cryptography.

Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It isn’t a direct supply or solicitation of a suggestion to purchase or promote, or a advice or endorsement of any merchandise, providers, or firms. doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the writer is accountable, instantly or not directly, for any harm or loss brought on or alleged to be attributable to or in reference to using or reliance on any content material, items or providers talked about on this article.

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles